I would say something both witty and withering, but I'm not smart enough to think of anything. I'm just sitting in the corner sobbing because some B-School graduate thinks I'm not smart enough. Waaahh!
Except I am, thank you very much. And so are my co-workers. (Well, most of them...) I've met complete idiots in HR. I've met complete idiots in finance, marketing, legal, IS, research and, most recently at a home improvement store. I've also met brilliant people in all of those departments. (Even the home improvement store.)
It's undoubtedly true that the "best and brightest" MBA candidates steer clear of Human Resources, but that does not mean HR people are less bright than the MBA students. (Although many of my colleagues have MBAs.) The reason I don't have one? I don't want one right now. That may change some day. In my experience, HR is largely female. Females tend to be the primary child rearer. Many women with small children don't want to be fighting their way up the corporate ladder.
He also seems shocked that HR professionals rarely identified finance classes as being important to their career. Can I say, duh? I've been in HR for over 7 years, in several different positions. Finance isn't what I do. Why would I say that a finance class was especially helpful if it wasn't?
But, Mr. Hammonds asks some excellent questions:
Why are annual performance appraisals so time-consuming -- and so routinely useless? Why is HR so often a henchman for the chief financial officer, finding ever-more ingenious ways to cut benefits and hack at payroll? Why do its communications -- when we can understand them at all -- so often flout reality? Why are so many people processes duplicative and wasteful, creating a forest of paperwork for every minor transaction? And why does HR insist on sameness as a proxy for equity?
Excellent questions and I'll give you the inside answers. But later. I have to go do something other than grab for the brass ring.