I don't do bumper stickers, but if I did, I would put this on my car. (From cafe press, of course.)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Why am I evil? Well, I'm not, but that's the perception of all of us in HR. Need to fire someone? Come to HR. Need to explain to someone why, even after working their rear end off all year, that their annual increase is 2.7%? Come to HR. Need to come up with new mountains of paperwork? Come to HR. So, come join me on the Evil Side. Oh, and send me your HR questions.
I don't do bumper stickers, but if I did, I would put this on my car. (From cafe press, of course.)
10 comments:
that's fabulous!
Is this a prelude to your announcing your candidacy?
I think that sums up my feeling too.
Ooo--I want one. And a yard sign.
Should that be "whomever"?
Any English majors out there?
I used to have one that said, "Don't vote, it will only encourage them."
Yeah, really. I find the anti-incumbent strategy really works well.
Anonymous, most English instructors are willing to overlook grammatical foibles in favor of particularly witty or interesting content. I would argue that this text qualifies for just such an exception. History profs on the other hand...
As long as we're talking grammar, my pet peeve is "them." Only one person can be president so it should be "whoever's running with him."
I realize that has fallen out of fashion because "him" doesn't sound very inclusive--even though the masculine used to represent both genders. So, unless Hillary would never be who you hate least, I would suggest "Whoever's running with him/her."
I may have to buy a t-shirt.
I've never voted FOR anyone...I've always voted AGAINST the candidate I hated the most. It's kind of sad.
Post a Comment